NEW - Municipal Connect Forum

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 3 Dec 2025 10:36 AM
    Message # 13569123
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The OMTRA Legislation Committee is seeking your input on Municipal Connect and potential enhancements to the platform. MPAC has continued to make updates and improvements, and we want to ensure that future changes further reflect the needs of municipalities.

    To help guide this work, we are asking members to share:

    • Your most used areas within Municipal Connect
    • The challenges or pain points you experience in those areas
    • Any enhancements or improvements you would like to see

    Please use this newly created Forum to submit your feedback. Your insights will help us better understand how municipalities use the platform and identify opportunities for improvement.

    We are hoping to gather lots of feedback from the membership and incorporate this feedback into our discussions with MPAC to drive meaningful improvements.

    Last modified: 3 Dec 2025 12:19 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 19 Dec 2025 12:49 PM
    Reply # 13574642 on 13569123

    City of Mississauga Assessment Review and Appeals staff – common uses of Municipal Connect and corresponding challenges (where applicable):

    Municipal Connect overall functionality – frequent delays in getting the authentication/login code and once signed in, session times out too quickly.

    My Properties to review property information (CVA, satellite view of property, adjacent rolls, tax class, updates of any SUPPS/OMITS or any recent changes) – Municipal Connect doesn't specify when a property was last inspected. Watchlist feature doesn't provide notification when there is an update.  

    My Properties to review RFRs/PRANs/etc. – History Reason provides only key points, and an MR Enquiry must be sent to get more detailed information about the reason for the appeal. Would be helpful if the “History Reason” could provide more detail and nature of change code.

    My Properties to understand event history and current status – there doesn’t seem to be a way to display previous versions instead of just the latest one which would be helpful for comparison/analysis.

    My Properties to review retired rolls – it would be helpful if the satellite view was available for retired rolls.

    My Properties to review property information and history for prior years – when reviewing a property that has been consolidated (i.e. missing parking PIN with separate roll number), Municipal Connect displays a “1” under apportionment and only the most current view. The previous events for each roll return year or other past events are not visible.

    My Properties to review retired rolls (filter feature) – when searching by roll, if the roll number is retired, the message “0 Records Found” appears. A different message to indicate the roll is retired and identify any child roll numbers, would be helpful. The filter feature is not very user friendly.  

    My Work to submit new tax adjustment applications or to look up previously submitted applications – consistent loading issues. When attempting to find a property, the page continuously refreshes and erases search inputs for several minutes before being functional.

    My Work to check status of an MR Enquiry – not very user friendly. It is unclear what fields need to be filled in and often takes several attempts to retrieve/view your request.

    My Work to submit a property specific inquiry – difficult to add an attachment (main/supporting document) to your inquiry. Drag and drop feature rarely works, and you usually have to make several “browse” attempts to add the attachment. Often have to refresh page, re-enter inquiry details and attach document(s) again. The document title also cannot contain any special characters/symbols like (, & sign or #.  Must rename documents to remove these before you can upload the supporting document.

    My Products to download/review reports such as Amended Property Assessment Notices (PRANS), History of Deleted Profiles, Municipal Change Profile etc. - no functionality concerns to note at this time.

  • 30 Dec 2025 10:38 AM
    Reply # 13577224 on 13569123

    A nice enhancement would be a control total report that shows new growth separate from valuation adjustments.

  • 23 Jan 2026 4:17 PM
    Reply # 13588710 on 13569123

    We see "no data" when we click on an area of the map sometimes, but it could mean several different things:

    - it is outside our boundaries so we do not have access

    - it is not mapped and/or not assessed.  We have had many of these where asking about it generates a SCIF.  

    - it is City owned LNA (but we cannot tell this as opposed to just a mapping error)...there is no way to see that it is done this way on purpose.

    It would be helpful if we could tell the difference between which of these situations it is.  Why can't it say "out of bounds" if it is outside our boundaries, as that would make it a lot clearer too as to where the boundary lines are.  

    Mapping of federally owned properties (specifically the Welland Canal) is also very poorly maintained over time which is frustrating.  

  • 3 Feb 2026 10:46 AM
    Reply # 13593521 on 13569123

    My Work Portal often does not take an attachment.

    Times out to soon.  Mapping not always correct.

        

  • 3 Feb 2026 12:47 PM
    Reply # 13593594 on 13569123

    Search under "My Properties" (for internal planning purposes only):

    i.e. 

    for all Prop Code 301’s in Vaughan the search results come out to a total of 65,259 roll numbers.

    And when we attempt to download the results to analyze the Avg/Median Assessments, we are limited to a Record Max of 5,000 roll numbers which includes supplier data.

    However when we download the entire 65,259 roll numbers in Excel the CVA’s do not populate! We only can retrieve the following data (which is not helpful whatsoever).

    Roll Number

    Municipality

    Municipal Address

    Roll Create Date

    Property Code

    Property Series

    TTL Flag

    Site Area

    Site UOM

    Frontage (feet)

    Depth (feet)

    Site Access

    Improvement Code (All)

    Improvement Code

    Year Built

    Classification Code

    Total Floor Area (square feet)

    Can we get MPAC to include the CVA’s when we download roll numbers in excess of 5,000?



    Last modified: 3 Feb 2026 12:56 PM | Anonymous member
  • 3 Feb 2026 1:58 PM
    Reply # 13593641 on 13569123

    A downloadable excel for write offs would assist greatly with reconciling and audits.

  • 4 Feb 2026 11:19 AM
    Reply # 13594042 on 13569123

    Frequent delays obtaining log in code, once signed in session times out too soon.

    My Properties - reason for adjustments (ie. PRANS, RFR MOS etc) could be more detailed, time consuming to submit a my work enquiry re adj. 

    My Properties/Filters/Events/Event Status - In progress & Approved/Event Type - SUP & OMT - frequently download upcoming supp/omits report into excel to review & verify prior to publishing, often times the excel extract format is different (missing columns) then prev,. download which makes it difficult to add in new supp/omits to existing report. 

    While in current view of a specific property the events timeline can be difficult for many staff to navigate, we continuously remind staff to read the event type and note date as the CVA in top right may not be the CVA on the current roll ie YEA. Also if you just want to see sales on a property there could be many events listed (supp,Crt, yea) in btwn each TOS, it would be more efficient if all event types were found in the same area ie all sales, all MOS/CRT, all supp/omts....another improvement would be to have the SCIF att. to the roll (parent & child),  the bldg permit detail in work objects for each applicable roll is a helpful addition. 

    My Products - Dislike the full description of products ready for downland, I preferred the acronyms list ie PRAN, TIA, PACN as it was more efficient to speed read.

    My Work functionality is not always efficient for example the added step of identifying if the att. is main or supporting document as well as renaming the document because MConnect does not accept special characters/symbols.

  • 4 Feb 2026 3:16 PM
    Reply # 13594214 on 13569123

    I work in assessment appeals at the City of Vaughan, and I wanted to share two data related issues we have encountered with Municipal Connect that may be affecting how municipalities search for, analyze, and compare commercial/industrial properties, particularly in the context of assessment appeals.

    1) The first issue relates to the "Total Floor Area (square feet)" field, which does not appear to provide a reliable or consistent measure of building size across properties. For properties assessed on the income approach, this field is often blank, making it impossible to filter or search for properties based on size. For properties assessed on the cost approach, the field typically reflects only one component of the building, often the largest improvement, rather than the aggregate assessable floor area reflected in the GRAD. As a result, the reported floor area understates the true size of the property and does not represent the total gross floor area. Because total floor area is a key point of comparison when identifying similar properties in appeals, this limitation makes size based searches either impossible or factually incorrect and requires municipalities to manually review GRAD records on a property by property basis, which undermines the efficiency and analytical purpose of Municipal Connect.

    A potential solution to this issue would be for Municipal Connect to provide an accurate and consistently populated total floor area value that reflects the aggregate assessable floor area of all improvements associated with a property, as recorded in the GRAD. This total floor area should be available regardless of valuation approach and should represent the full gross floor area contributing to the returned assessment. Providing a true aggregated floor area field would allow municipalities to reliably search for and compare properties of similar size and would reduce the need for manual reconciliation across multiple improvement records.

    2) The second issue relates to the preparation of equity studies, which are required in most assessment appeals. Equity analysis is typically conducted by comparing a property’s returned assessment to its time adjusted sale price using assessment to sale ratios. In Municipal Connect, sales are filtered using the field labelled "CVA at time of sale". For equity studies in the current assessment cycle, the typical sales period is January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016, given the January 1, 2016 valuation date. However, when a sale occurs between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015, Municipal Connect returns the January 1, 2012 CVA rather than the January 1, 2016 CVA. As a result, sales within the same equity study period are paired with different assessment bases, which introduces inconsistency into the analysis and requires municipalities to manually reconcile CVAs to ensure comparability.

    A potential solution to this second issue would be to provide an option within Municipal Connect to filter or display the returned CVA for the relevant valuation date, rather than only the CVA at the time of sale. Providing access to a consistent valuation date CVA would allow all sales within an equity study period to be analyzed against the same assessment base, improve the reliability of equity studies, and reduce the need for manual adjustments by municipalities.


  • 5 Feb 2026 8:59 AM
    Reply # 13594509 on 13569123

    Some enhancements that we’d like to see are:

    • Ability to search for retired rolls without needing to enter filters in My Properties
    • Ability to see lineage (child and parent rolls) on the property profile
    • SCIFs being available on the property profile
    • When selecting a parcel of a condominium/strata a list of all rolls associated with the parcel should come up instead of a random address associated with it
    • Search function should work for roll numbers that include dashes and period. The ARB provides them with dashes and we have confirmed with MPAC they have this ability on their back end
    • Historical records that go back at least 1 reassessment (2012 CVA)


<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 

Association Mailing Address
The Ontario Municipal Tax & Revenue Association
14845-6 Yonge Street, Suite 119, Aurora, ON, L4G 6H8

HST # R125384941 

webmaster@omtra.ca

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software